Rubric 05 06 Case Studies Week 2

Unit 5 and 6
Case Study Assignment
Week 2

(approximate point ranges given in parentheses)

+5 extra credit badge points for perfect scores in the Monitoring and Mitigation categories!

Category Unsatisfactory Fair Good Excellent
Monitoring
(9 points)
Not completed
or
incomplete, poorly written answers. Many errors found in the content and writing.
Not all questions answered. Writing is not always clear or correct. Mistakes found in the content. All questions answered adequately, but not in detail. A few minor mistakes found in the content and/or writing. All questions answered in detail. Introduction is well written, and shows a high level of effort. Content meets to exceeds requirements.
Mitigation
(9 points)
Not completed
or
incomplete, poorly written answers. Many errors found in the content and writing.
Not all questions answered. Writing is not always clear or correct. Mistakes found in the content. All questions answered adequately, but not in detail. A few minor mistakes. Shows adequate effort and understanding. All questions answered in detail. Shows high level of effort in learning about mitigation methods.
Hazard Mapping
(7 points)
Not completed
or
incomplete, poorly written answers. Many errors found in the content and writing.
Not all questions answered. Writing is not always clear or correct. Mistakes found in the content. All questions answered adequately, but not in detail. A few minor mistakes found. Shows adequate level of critical thinking and application to case study event. All questions answered in detail. Answers show a high level of effort and critical thinking assessing how maps/assessment used during case study event.
Blog posts
(10 points total for post and comments- includes summary and game posts)
Not completed
or
incomplete, poorly written post.
Post does not include all required information. Writing is not always clear or correct. Mistakes found in the content. Post includes all required information adequately. Mostly well written, with only a few minor errors. Post includes all required information and is detailed and informative.
Blog comment Not completed
or
incomplete, poorly written post. Or, disrespectful, harsh, negative.
One comment completed but the writing is not clear or content is inaccurate. Not very useful to the student. One comment completed containing adequate detail. Writing is mostly clear. Question is basically useful to the student. More than one comment completed. Questions are clear and insightful, useful to other students.
Reply to comments Not completed
or
incomplete, poorly written reply. Does not answer the question posed.
Reply contains mistakes and the writing is unclear. Fair level of understanding of the basic science. Reply is mostly clear, but may contain a few errors. Good level of understanding of the basic science. Reply is clear and accurate. Shows excellent understanding  and answer teaches others about the topic.
Writing/grammar Unsatisfactory – one word answers given, or writing is not understandable. Incomplete sentences, numerous errors found. Writing is not clear throughout. Writing is complete and only contains minor errors Excellent detailed writing, with complete, error-free sentences
Timeliness 3-7 days late (-50%) 1 to 3 days late (-10%) On time