Rubric 09 Capstone Project
Unit 9
Capstone
The final project MUST be turned in on time – no late work will be accepted
| Category | Unsatisfactory (0-90 pts) |
Fair (90-120 pts) |
Good (120-135 pts) |
Excellent (135-150 pts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Content | Not completed or incomplete, incomprehensible video |
Not all content is accurate, and significant issues found in more than one category. Shows incomplete understanding of the hazards, risk, and preparedness content. | Mostly accurate overall content. Shows adequate understanding of the hazards, risk, and preparedness content and basic ability to teach others. | Detailed, accurate overall content. Shows excellent, in-depth understanding of the hazards, risk, and preparedness content and ability to teach it to others clearly and efficiently. |
| Introduction (15 points) |
Not completed or severely incomplete. Shows no evidence of improvement over Case Study report |
Incomplete content or missing the figure or shows little improvement from Case Study report |
Complete content and figure or shows evidence for some improvement over Case Study report |
Excellent and detailed content includes a clear, well-crafted figure fulfilling the assignment requirements. And/or shows dramatic improvement over Case Study report |
| Basic Science (25 pts) |
Not completed or severely incomplete. Shows no evidence of improvement over Case Study report |
Incomplete content or missing the figure or shows little improvement from Week 1 assignment. |
Complete content and figure or shows evidence for some improvement over Case Study report |
Excellent and detailed content includes a clear, well-crafted figure fulfilling the assignment requirements. And/or shows dramatic improvement over Case Study report |
| Monitoring “before and after” (25 pts) |
Not completed or incomplete. Too many errors or mistakes in science. Not useful for teaching |
Not all content is accurate, and significant issues found in basic science presentation. Needs improvement before use as educational tool. | Mostly accurate science content. Shows adequate understanding of the hazards, risk, and preparedness content and basic ability to teach others. | Detailed, accurate science content. Shows excellent, in-depth understanding of the basic science and an ability to teach it to others clearly and efficiently. |
| Risk/vulnerability “before and after” (25 pts) |
Not completed or incomplete. Many errors or mistakes in content. Not useful for teaching |
Not all content is accurate, and significant issues found in basic science presentation. Needs improvement before use as educational tool. | Mostly accurate risk content. Shows adequate understanding of the hazards, risk, and preparedness content and basic ability to teach others. | Detailed, accurate risk content. Shows excellent, in-depth understanding of the basic science and an ability to teach it to others clearly and efficiently. |
| Preparedness “before and after” (25 points) |
Not completed or incomplete. Many errors or mistakes made. Not useful for teaching |
Not all content is accurate, and significant issues found in basic science presentation. Needs improvement before use as educational tool. | Mostly accurate preparedness content. Shows adequate understanding of the hazards, risk, and preparedness content and basic ability to teach others. | Detailed, accurate preparedness content. Shows excellent, in-depth understanding of the basic science and an ability to teach it to others clearly and efficiently. |
| Summary (20 points) |
Not completed or severely incomplete. Does not clearly describe community status, or provide a realistic recommendation for improvement |
Content is incomplete. Provides a very basic description of present community status. Recommendation for improvement is somewhat realistic. | Content is complete. Provides a good though not detailed description of present community status. Recommendation for improvement is realistic. | Content is thoughtful and detailed. Provides an excellent and detailed description of present community status. Recommendation for improvement is excellent and realistic. |
| Presentation quality (15 points) |
Rough, poorly organized, incomplete presentation. | Presentation quality needs improvement. | Presentation is mostly clear, adequately organized and presented. | Excellent presentation quality. Organization is clear, understandable. |
| Overall quality | Rough presentation quality, incompleteness, and errors in content. Poor educational tool | Presentation quality needs improvement. Content is either incomplete, or needs work. Needs improvement as educational tool. | Satisfactory content, with only minor errors. Presentation is mostly clear, adequately organized and presented. Good, basic educational tool. | Excellent presentation quality. Detailed and accurate content. Organization is clear, understandable. Excellent educational tool. |