Rubric 08 Preparedness Presentation

Unit 8
Preparedness Presentation

Approximate point ranges given in parantheses

Category Unsatisfactory(0-45 pts) Fair(45-60 pts) Good(60-70 pts) Excellent(70-75 pts)
Overall Content Not completed
or
incomplete, incomprehensible content
Not all content is accurate, or well described. One of the examples is missing. Mostly accurate and complete content. Includes one example of both pre-course evaluation and improvements. Detailed, accurate overall content. Includes more than one example of both pre-course evaluation and improvements.
Pre-course preparedness Not completed
or
very incomplete. Does not convey much information about pre-course individual preparedness
Conveys only a fair amount of information, or preparedness description or example is   vague. Complete, provides a clear description of pre-course readiness, including one example. Adequate time spent on the assignment. Detailed, very clearly described pre-course individual preparedness, including more than one example. Shows the student spent time working on the assessment.
Improvement Not completed
or
incomplete, or no improvements made
Improvement is incomplete, or shows minimal effort. Poorly described complete content. Good improvement(s) made to preparedness, and one example is adequately described in the presentation. Detailed, extensive improvement(s) made. More than one example given, very well described in the presentation in a way that others can learn from.
Blog Self Assessment comment Not completed
or
incomplete, or no improvements made
Self assessment is brief and shows a little effort in comparing with others. Good self assessment shows that the student put some effort into learning from other students Excellent self assessment shows the student critically evaluated themselves, thought about, and learned from other students.
Presentation quality Rough, poorly organized, incomplete presentation. Presentation quality needs improvement. Presentation is mostly clear, adequately organized and presented. Excellent presentation quality. Organization is clear, understandable.
Overall quality Rough presentation quality, incompleteness, and errors in content. Poor educational tool Presentation quality needs improvement. Content is either incomplete, or needs work. Needs improvement as educational tool. Satisfactory content, with only minor errors. Presentation is mostly clear, adequately organized and presented. Good, basic educational tool. Excellent presentation quality. Detailed and accurate content. Organization is clear, understandable. Excellent educational tool.
Timeliness 3-7 days late (-50%) 1 to 3 days late (-10%) On time

GEOS 380