Rubric 05 06 Case Studies Week 2
Unit 5 and 6
Case Study Assignment
Week 2
(approximate point ranges given in parentheses)
| Category | Unsatisfactory | Fair | Good | Excellent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monitoring (9 points) |
Not completed or incomplete, poorly written answers. Many errors found in the content and writing. |
Not all questions answered. Writing is not always clear or correct. Mistakes found in the content. | All questions answered adequately, but not in detail. A few minor mistakes found in the content and/or writing. | All questions answered in detail. Introduction is well written, and shows a high level of effort. Content meets to exceeds requirements. |
| Mitigation (9 points) |
Not completed or incomplete, poorly written answers. Many errors found in the content and writing. |
Not all questions answered. Writing is not always clear or correct. Mistakes found in the content. | All questions answered adequately, but not in detail. A few minor mistakes. Shows adequate effort and understanding. | All questions answered in detail. Shows high level of effort in learning about mitigation methods. |
| Hazard Mapping (7 points) |
Not completed or incomplete, poorly written answers. Many errors found in the content and writing. |
Not all questions answered. Writing is not always clear or correct. Mistakes found in the content. | All questions answered adequately, but not in detail. A few minor mistakes found. Shows adequate level of critical thinking and application to case study event. | All questions answered in detail. Answers show a high level of effort and critical thinking assessing how maps/assessment used during case study event. |
| Blog posts (10 points total for post and comments- includes summary and game posts) |
Not completed or incomplete, poorly written post. |
Post does not include all required information. Writing is not always clear or correct. Mistakes found in the content. | Post includes all required information adequately. Mostly well written, with only a few minor errors. | Post includes all required information and is detailed and informative. |
| Blog comment | Not completed or incomplete, poorly written post. Or, disrespectful, harsh, negative. |
One comment completed but the writing is not clear or content is inaccurate. Not very useful to the student. | One comment completed containing adequate detail. Writing is mostly clear. Question is basically useful to the student. | More than one comment completed. Questions are clear and insightful, useful to other students. |
| Reply to comments | Not completed or incomplete, poorly written reply. Does not answer the question posed. |
Reply contains mistakes and the writing is unclear. Fair level of understanding of the basic science. | Reply is mostly clear, but may contain a few errors. Good level of understanding of the basic science. | Reply is clear and accurate. Shows excellent understanding and answer teaches others about the topic. |
| Writing/grammar | Unsatisfactory — one word answers given, or writing is not understandable. | Incomplete sentences, numerous errors found. Writing is not clear throughout. | Writing is complete and only contains minor errors | Excellent detailed writing, with complete, error-free sentences |
| Timeliness | 3-7 days late (-20%) | 1 to 3 days late (-10%) | On time | |